Scientists Lie

Scientists Lie

Scientists lie.

Scientists lie whenever they try to convince us that chance can do causation.

The math doesn’t lie.

That’s why I find mathematical proofs so convincing.  I’m a statistician, mathematician, and logician as well as being a philosopher and a scientist.  In subsequent parts of this essay, I will use simple math and statistics to demonstrate that scientists lie whenever they make chance the cause of their scientific theories, because chance cannot do causation of any kind.  For now, I will start by introducing the Philosophy of Science that supports this truth assertion.

Most of my books are about the Philosophy of Science.

I studied and wrote about the Philosophy of Science for years trying to find a true and realistic Philosophy of Science that is actually based upon the observations and lived experiences of the human race as a whole.

So, what did I learn?

Well first of all, I learned that there is a fatal flaw built directly into the Scientific Method that prevents us from using the Scientific Method to prove anything true.  This is the affirming the consequent or the jumping to conclusions logic fallacy.

There are many different versions of the Scientific Method and many different Scientific Methods or scientific methodologies.  The following version of the standard Scientific Method, that shows up in many of our college textbooks, makes the affirming the consequent logic fallacy somewhat obvious.  You still have to use your brain in order to see it, though.

THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD

1)  Form a HYPOTHESIS.

2)  Select a SCIENTIFIC METHOD or Scientific Methodology to TEST the hypothesis.

3)  Run the Science Experiment; and then, Observe and Measure the RESULTS.

4)  Find the BEST INTERPRETATION or the BEST EXPLANATION for the Scientific Data, the Scientific Evidence, the Scientific Observations, and the RESULTS of the Science Experiment.

Notice that Science, the Scientific Method, and Science Experiments are OBSERVATION.  Observation is step three of this process.

If something has NEVER been experienced NOR observed – not even by God – then it doesn’t exist.  This is Logic 101, and the very foundation of the Scientific Method.  We NEED observations in order for it to be science.  It has to be caught in the act, or it isn’t science.  It’s nothing but pure speculation instead.  Scientific evidence has to be eye-witness evidence!  It has to be experienced and observed in order for it to be real and true.

There has to be Someone Intelligent or Someone Psyche who is there to make the observations, or Science and the Scientific Methods don’t work.  There has to be someone there to do the Science, otherwise science and the scientific methods don’t do anything.

Creation by Chance or Chance Causation has NEVER been experienced NOR observed because chance cannot do causation.  Chance and causation are mutually exclusive.  They falsify each other.  It has to be experienced and observed in order for it to be real and true.  Causation by Chance, or Creation by Chance, or Creation Ex Nihilo (Atheism) has never been experienced nor observed, which means that it isn’t science.

If you want the truth, it is important to allow all of the evidence into evidence – and that includes ALL the times when mass, heat, and entropy have gone to zero and ceased to exist.  We can’t have the truth if people are constantly deleting, changing, hiding, and destroying evidence, observations, or the lived experiences of the human race.

Science IS observation, experience, and knowledge.  It has to be experienced and observed, or there’s no way to know that its real and true.  It has to be experienced and observed in order for it to be science or knowledge.

For example, our resurrected Lord Jesus Christ has been experienced and observed both in the flesh and during our near-death experiences.  He is the being of light and love that people encounter during their near-death experiences and out-of-body experiences.  He has been experienced and observed many times by thousands of different people both in the flesh and in the spirit; therefore, WE KNOW that He is real and that He truly exists; and, that’s the ONLY way that we can KNOW that He is real and truly exists.  He has to reveal Himself to some of us from time to time, or we would NEVER know that He exists.  That’s just the way it is.  Science is observation.  If there are no observations, then it isn’t science.  The ONLY way that we can KNOW that God exists is to see Him and touch Him for ourselves, or to choose to trust someone who has.  This is logical common sense, and everyone overlooks it all the time, because they want their personal speculations and wishful thinking to be true instead.

If it’s never been experienced nor observed, then it is completely worthless as scientific evidence and shouldn’t be used as scientific evidence.  A scientific theory has to be experienced and observed by someone, sometime, somewhere; or, there’s no way that it could ever possibly be true.  That’s what’s wrong with the Many Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.  Nobody has ever observed it or experienced it, which makes it worthless.

Creation by Chance, or Chance Causation, or Creation Ex Nihilo (Atheism) has NEVER been experienced NOR observed because chance cannot do causation; therefore, WE KNOW that it isn’t real and that it doesn’t exist.  God can’t even do Creation Ex Nihilo, so why believe that evolution or entropy can?  The Gods work with what already exists, and then try to raise it to a higher level of being or existence.  The LAW of Conservation of Energy tells us that the Gods can’t do Creation Ex Nihilo.  Therefore, the Conservation of Energy Law also tells us that evolution, chance, and entropy can’t do Creation Ex Nihilo either.  This is how we use the Scientific Methods to find and know the truth – by studying what has actually been experienced and observed.  The Conservation of Energy and the Perpetual Motion Cycle E = mc2 have been experienced and observed; therefore, we KNOW that they are real and true.  The same thing can be said for Quantum Mechanics and the Quantum Fields.

OBSERVATION or First-Hand Experience is one of the Scientific Methods.  There are many different Scientific Methods or scientific methodologies, and OBSERVATION is the best.  A phenomenon has to be experienced and observed, or it can’t possibly be real and true.

The QUICKEST and BEST way to find and know the truth is to live it, experience it, and observe it for yourself, or to choose to trust someone who has.  This is infinitely faster, better, and more reliable than any science experiment.  Furthermore, Science and every science experiment have to be based upon observations and eye-witness evidence, or it isn’t science.  Observation is the best form of Science, because we KNOW that it is real and true.

Observation is an integral and essential part of the Scientific Method.  No observations, then no science.  Then we are looking at nothing but philosophy, guesswork, and wishful thinking instead.  Creation by Chance or Creation Ex Nihilo has never been experienced nor observed, therefore, it can’t possibly be real and true.  Both the theory of evolution and the second law of thermodynamics are Creation by Chance or Creation Ex Nihilo or Spontaneous Generation or Magic, which means that they can’t possibly be real or true.  It’s that simple.  They have never been experienced nor observed.

The second law of thermodynamics states that the total amount of entropy or disorder in our universe is constantly increasing and that it can never decrease and go to zero.  This claim is obviously false.  The very fact that we exist is scientific proof that this claim is false.  We haven’t observed anything that the second law of thermodynamics predicts.  We don’t observe proton decay.  We don’t observe an ever-encroaching gray goo coming in at us from all sides.  We don’t observe ever-increasing disorder or chaos.  We don’t even observe heat death.  Heat death doesn’t exist.  Heat death or absolute zero represents Maximum Efficiency when it comes to photons, quantum waves, psyches, quantum consciousness, quantum information, quantum fields, and superconductors.  Does it not?  We don’t observe anything that the second law of thermodynamics predicts, which is why it is false.

Instead, we observe constantly conserved order and organization thanks to the massless and entropyless Quantum Fields, the Conservation of Energy and Psyche, the Conservation of Quantum Information within Psyche, and the Perpetual Motion Cycle E = mc2.  The observation of these things falsifies the second law of thermodynamics as well as creation by chance, or creation by entropy, or creation by random disorder.

Based upon the Observation Version of the Scientific Method, the second law of thermodynamics is false.  Furthermore, entropy defined as “disorder” has absolutely nothing to do with thermodynamics or heat.  There’s NO correlation between the two, which means that there’s no way in this universe that the second law of thermodynamics could ever be true.  Likewise, based upon the Creation by Chance or the Creation by Random Disorder definition for entropy and the second law of thermodynamics, we automatically KNOW that the second law is false because chance of any kind cannot do choice, design, creation, nor causation.  Everything that exists falsifies the second law of thermodynamics.

This is what we want – Truth in Science and Truth through Science – not all the fiction, deceptions, and lies that we typically get from our scientists.  Anytime a scientist or college professor tells us that chance can design and create anything if given enough time to do so, we automatically KNOW that he or she is lying to us because chance cannot do causation.  Chance and causation are mutually exclusive.

The primary axiom of Statistics states that chance cannot do causation.  Chance and causation are mutually exclusive.  Chance can NEVER produce a Real Effect.  Once it starts doing so, then it is no longer chance.  Chance or the Null Hypothesis produces a correlation coefficient of ZERO.  By definition, the size of the effect (coefficient of determination) from chance is also ZERO.  Chance doesn’t determine anything, because it produces no effect.  Chance is the Null Hypothesis, which means that chance doesn’t do anything.  In other words, chance does null or nil.  The Null Hypothesis means that there is NO causal relationship between our independent variable and our dependent variable.  The Null Hypothesis means that our independent variable has NO EFFECT on our dependent variable.  Chance or the Null Hypothesis cannot do causation.  Once it starts producing an effect, then it is no longer chance.  This is the heart of Science and Statistics whether we realize it or not.

Therefore, Materialism, Naturalism, Darwinism, Nihilism, Atheism, Chemical Evolution, Spontaneous Generation, Abiogenesis, Macro-Evolution, Creation by Random Disorder, Creation by Entropy, Creation Ex Nihilo, the Theory of Evolution, and the Second Law of Thermodynamics are AUTOMATICALLY FALSE because they are by definition Creation by Chance or Causation by Chance.  They are AUTOMATICALLY FALSE because they have never been experienced nor observed, because chance cannot do creation, choice, or causation.  Once it starts doing so, then it is no longer chance.  These falsified philosophies of science or interpretations of science are AUTOMATICALLY FALSE because these people teach, preach, and believe that Chance designed, and created, and produced everything that exists in this universe.  That’s what they teach and believe, is it not?

Lack of observational support is one of the ways in which the Scientific Method and a Scientific Theory FAILS to meet its burden of proof.  Then people start making up anything they want in order to explain the evidence that they are observing, when they fail to observe the things that they expect to happen by chance alone.  There have to be OBSERVATIONS in order for there to be True Scientific Evidence.  Science is observation, experience, and knowledge after all – or it should be.  OBSERVATIONS are absolutely essential when it comes to Science, Science Experiments, and the Scientific Method.  Without them, we don’t have science but are dealing with pure speculation or guesswork instead.

However, it is in the fourth and final step of the Scientific Method where the whole process typically FAILS thanks to all of the false and falsified personal INTERPRETATIONS that we fallible human beings choose to give to the scientific data, scientific evidence, or the results of our science experiments.

Materialism, Naturalism, Darwinism, Nihilism, and Atheism are faulty and falsified philosophies of science or interpretations of science.  They are NOT science.  They are interpretations of science or philosophies of science.  They are AUTOMATICALLY FALSE because they use chance exclusively as their creative mechanism, and chance can never do choice or causation.  Once it starts doing so, then it is no longer chance.

According to the Philosophy of Science, thanks to the affirming the consequent logic fallacy that’s built into the Scientific Method, there are theoretically an infinite number of different, contradictory, mutually exclusive, self-defeating, and self-falsifying INTERPRETATIONS that can be given to each piece of scientific evidence or scientific data that we develop or produce.

This is also where the Materialists, Naturalists, Darwinists, Nihilists, and Atheists FAIL because they are constantly giving faulty and falsified INTEPRETATIONS to all of the different science experiments that they conduct.

They directly employ the affirming the consequent or the jumping to conclusions logic fallacy to their scientific data in order to prove that the theory of evolution and the second law of thermodynamics are true.  These people jump to the conclusion that chance can design and create anything that it sets its mind to, if given enough time to do so.  That’s NOT science.  That’s cheating!  But they don’t even know it, because they don’t understand the Philosophy of Science.  These people don’t study the Philosophy of Science in school because the Philosophy of Science PROVES that Materialism, Naturalism, Darwinism, Nihilism, Atheism, the Theory of Evolution, and the Second Law of Thermodynamics ARE FALSE.  These people toss out and reject everything that falsifies their theories and their ideas.  That’s how they do “science”.  They cheat!

The Materialists, Naturalists, Darwinists, Nihilists, and Atheists have jumped to the conclusion that CHANCE can design and create anything, if given enough time to do so.  That’s what they teach, preach, and believe, is it not?  They have NEVER tested that hypothesis, because they can’t.  Chance doesn’t do anything without an intelligent assist from some type of intelligent being.  By definition and by axiom, CHANCE cannot design and create anything because CHANCE cannot do choice and causation.  Once chance starts doing causation, then it is no longer chance!  This is the fundamental axiom of Science and Statistics.  Chance and causation are mutually exclusive.  This is the Truth in Science and Statistics, whether we realize it or not.  Chance cannot do causation.  Saying that it can doesn’t change the fact that it can’t.  Scientists are lying to us whenever they say that CHANCE can do choice, design, or causation if given enough time to do so.

The inability of the Theory of Evolution to meet its burden of proof through a preponderance of the evidence ends up becoming Scientific Proof of God’s Existence or Scientific Proof of God’s Necessity, whether we realize it or not.  This simple observation is based upon the “best explanation rule” or the “parsimony rule” in Science, sometimes known as Occam’s Razor.

Creation by Chance, or Causation by Chance, or Creation by Random Disorder, or Creation by Entropy, or Creation Ex Nihilo, or Creation by Blind Luck – in other words, the Theory of Evolution – is NOT the best, nor the simplest, nor the most logical, nor the most rational, nor the most parsimonious explanation that can be given to scientific theories, scientific evidence, science experiments, and scientific data because chance of any kind cannot do causation.  A LIE, such as Creation by Chance or the Theory of Evolution, cannot serve as the best explanation or the most parsimonious explanation for the scientific evidence.  That’s just logical common sense.

I wrote a huge book on this topic.

The Theory of Evolution Proved to Me that God Exists

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B01HZYBZ7K/

Most people don’t understand this concept because they are NOT trained in our public schools to think of parsimony in terms of “observational evidence” or “meeting one’s burden of proof”.  Instead, we are trained to blindly accept CHANCE as the most parsimonious, most logical, most rational, and best explanation for the design and the creation of our amino acids, our proteins, our genes, our genomes, and the life forms on this planet.  It’s a lie, but we believe that it is true because our college professors constantly tell us that it is true.  It’s the modern-day form of brain washing.  If are told the lie long enough, we eventually come to believe that it is true.  The Behaviorists, Atheists, Darwinists, and Naturalists know this, so that’s why they keep lying to us.

Pagano, R.R. (2010). Understanding Statistics in the Behavioral Sciences (9th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Every experiment exists to give the null hypothesis a chance to be rejected.  (Understanding Statistics, p. 285.)

By definition, the Null Hypothesis in a science experiment is produced by chance alone.  The Null Hypothesis represents CHANCE, and the Alternative Hypothesis represents CAUSATION.  Chance and causation are mutually exclusive.

Statistics was designed to help scientists to produce a more realistic and demonstrably true INTERPRETATION of their scientific data and scientific evidence.  This is done by using Statistics to falsify and reject the Null Hypothesis, which is produced or “caused” by chance alone.

The whole purpose of Statistics, Science, the Scientific Method, and Science Experiments is to falsify and reject the Null Hypothesis, Creation by Chance, Chance Causality, Causation by Chance, or anything that is produced by chance alone.    The whole purpose of Statistics, Science, the Scientific Method, and Science Experiments is to falsify and reject Materialism, Naturalism, Darwinism, Nihilism, Atheism, Chemical Evolution, Spontaneous Generation, Abiogenesis, Creation by Death or Natural Selection, Creation by Random Chaos or Random Chance, the Theory of Evolution, the Second Law of Thermodynamics, or anything else that is produced by chance alone.

Therefore, WE KNOW that scientists and college professors are lying to us whenever they make the claim that Chance or the Null Hypothesis can do causation.  They don’t know what they are talking about whenever they make this claim, and they are making this claim all the time in everything that they do within our public schools.  These people are lying to us all the time because they have convinced themselves that chance can do causation at will, and they are wrong.

Mark My Words

 


The Next Essay in this Truth in Science Series